Skip to cookie consent Skip to main content

Research Spotlight: Enhancing Cancer Immunotherapy by Looking at the Gut Microbiome

6 minute read
Rakesh Jain, PhD
Rakesh Jain, PhD

Rakesh Jain, PhD, director of the Edwin L. Steele Laboratories in the Department of Radiation Oncology at Massachusetts General Hospital, is co-corresponding author of a paper published in Cancer Research, “Mathematical Modeling and Association Analysis Deciphers the Impact of the Gut Microbiome on Cancer Immunotherapy.”

Dr. Jain recently received the 2025 Lifetime Achievement in Cancer Research Award from the AACR, and Jennifer Wargo, MD, co-corresponding author, recently received the 2025 Jonathan Kraft Award for Excellence in Cancer Research.

Q: How would you summarize your study for a lay audience?

We wanted to understand how the gut microbiome impacts cancer immunotherapy outcomes and the potential interactions between the gut microbiome and the immune system.

We found that the gut microbiome does significantly impact the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapy and the relationship between the gut microbiome and the immune system.

By integrating mathematical modeling with microbiome data, we identified certain bacterial families or combinations of families with potential to enhance or diminish immune cell activation and killing, leading to improved tumor response to immunotherapy.

Our research offers a novel approach for optimizing cancer treatment strategies and paves the way for integrating microbiome analysis into clinical oncology, potentially improving immunotherapy in patients.

Q: What question were you investigating?

We sought to understand the mechanisms by which microbiome composition influences immune response and immunotherapy efficacy in cancer.

Q: What methods or approach did you use?

We employed a combination of mathematical modeling, association and regression analyses to explore the impact of the gut microbiome on cancer immunotherapy.

Our approach integrated microbiome data from preclinical studies with a mechanistic mathematical model of the antitumor immune response, which allows the investigation of how specific microbiome components influence the immune system.

The unique aspect of this approach was the merging of computational modeling with microbiome data. This framework allowed the simulation of tumor progression and predictions of the effects of microbiome modulation on immunotherapy outcomes.

By incorporating association analyses between microbiome profiles and immune system dynamics, we were able to identify key microbial factors that shape immune responses but cannot be measured experimentally.

Furthermore, by employing regression analyses, we extracted regression models that correlate the activation and killing efficiency of immune cells with specific microbiome families. The validity of these models was tested using both preclinical and clinical data.

Q: What did you find?

We found that the gut microbiome significantly affects the activation and killing efficiency of immune cells in cancer immunotherapy.

Specifically, we identified two key parameters of immune cells — the activation rate and killing rate —that are most affected by microbiome composition.

By integrating mathematical modeling with microbiome data, we identified certain bacterial families or combinations of families with potential to enhance or diminish immune cell activation and killing, leading to improved versus poor tumor response to immunotherapy.

The results suggest that gut microbiome modulation could be a viable strategy to optimize cancer treatment outcomes.

Additionally, the current approach provides a deeper understanding of microbiome-cancer interactions and offers a framework for predicting and improving immunotherapy efficacy.

Q: What are the implications?

This study has significant clinical implications for cancer immunotherapy. By demonstrating that the gut microbiome influences immune cell activation and killing efficiency, it suggests that microbiome modulation could be a viable strategy to enhance immunotherapy outcomes.

Q: What are the next steps?

The next phase of this work will focus on several key areas to advance both scientific understanding and clinical application.

The model will undergo clinical validation using larger patient datasets to ensure its predictive accuracy in real-world immunotherapy settings to assess how well the model can inform treatment decisions across diverse populations.

In parallel, we will explore microbiome-based interventions, such as fecal microbiota transplants, enriched with specific microbial populations to determine whether modifying the gut microbiome can directly improve treatment outcomes.

Additionally, we will explore how the gut microbiota influences immune cell activation and tumor progression, aiming to identify and understanding the molecular pathways for potential therapeutic strategies.

Ultimately, the goal is to translate these insights into personalized medicine approaches through the development of microbiome-derived biomarkers that could guide the personalization of immunotherapy for better effectiveness and minimizing adverse effects for individual patients.

Authorship: In addition to Jain, Mass General Brigham authors include Lance L. Munn. Additional authors include Andreas G. Hadjigeorgiou, Constantinos Harkos, and Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos of the University of Cyprus and Aditya K. Mishra, Golnaz Morad, Sarah B. Johnson, Nadim J. Ajami, and Jennifer A. Wargo from the University of Texas MD Anderson Medical Center.

Paper cited: Hadjigeorgiou, AG., et al. “Mathematical Modeling and Association Analysis Deciphers the Impact of the Gut Microbiome on Cancer Immunotherapy.” Cancer Research. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-24-2232

Funding: This work was supported by grants from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (863955, 101141357), NIH grants R01CA247441, R21EB031982 and U01CA2618425, R01-CA259253, R01-CA208205, R01-NS118929, R01CA219896, U01-CA261842, and U01-CA 224348, Outstanding Investigator Award (R35-CA197743), F32CA260769, and the National Foundation for Cancer Research, Jane’s Trust Foundation, Niles Albright Research Foundation and Harvard Ludwig Cancer Center.

Disclosures:  Jain received consultant fees from Cur, DynamiCure, Elpis, Innocoll, Merck, SynDevRx; owns equity in Accurius, Enlight, SynDevRx; and served on the Boards of Trustees of Tekla Healthcare Investors, Tekla Life Sciences Investors, Tekla Healthcare Opportunities Fund, Tekla World Healthcare Fund; and received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi. Jennifer A. Wargo is an inventor of US patent applications WO2020150429A1, US20200129569A1, WO2019191390A2, WO2020106983A1; reports advisory roles and honoraria Daiichi Sankyo, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, EverImmune, and OSE Immunotherapeutics.Wargo receives stock options from Micronoma. Munn receives equity from Bayer and is a consultant for SimBiosys. Neither any reagent nor any funding from any of the above organizations was used in this study. Other co-authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Media contact

Elizabeth Murphy
Program Director, External Communications

About Mass General Brigham

Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic health care system, uniting great minds to solve the hardest problems in medicine for our communities and the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, community and specialty hospitals, a health insurance plan, physician networks, community health centers, home care, and long-term care services. Mass General Brigham is a nonprofit organization committed to patient care, research, teaching, and service to the community. In addition, Mass General Brigham is one of the nation’s leading biomedical research organizations with several Harvard Medical School teaching hospitals. For more information, please visit massgeneralbrigham.org.